최경희 Choi Kyunghee , 박순애 Park Soonae
DOI: Vol.28(No.1) 1-30, 2021
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to analyze the structural relationship between goal setting, performance evaluation, autonomy, psychological safety, and subjective and objective performance, and to understand how the relationship between these variables differs according to the type of work. To achieve this research objective, this study established a model including psychological safety, goal setting, performance evaluation, and autonomy as determinants of psychological safety, and subjective and objective performance through review of theories and previous studies. This study utilized data from the public official perception survey on public sector performance in 2018. The subjects of this study were 1,082 public officials of the central government. The structural relationship between goal setting, performance evaluation, autonomy, psychological safety, subjective and objective performance was investigated through the structural equation model. A multi-group analysis was conducted to investigate the difference in the structural model according to the type of work, such as policy making, policy implementation, and support. As a result of the analysis, it was found that psychological safety had a positive effect on subjective performance, but did not affect objective performance. It was found that goal setting, performance evaluation, and autonomy all have a positive effect on psychological safety. Psychological safety was found to have a mediating effect in the relationship between goal setting, performance evaluation, autonomy and subjective performance. There was no difference in the structural model according to the type of work.
Key Words
심리적 안전, 목표설정, 성과평가, 자율성, 성과, Psychological Safety, Goal Setting, Performance Evaluation, Autonomy, Performance